Tabriz University of Medical Sciences About    Newsletter    Contact Us    Create Account    Log in  
Journal of Caring Sciences
   eISSN: 2251-9920  
Services
Export citation
EndNote
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Medlars
Refworks
Mendeley

Cite by
Google Scholar
PMC(2)


Article History
Submitted: 01 Jan 1900
Revised: 26 Jan 2012

Article Access Statistics
Abstract Page Views: 1000
PDF Downloads: 1000
Full Text Views: 0

J Caring Sci. 2012;1(2):73-78 doi: 10.5681/jcs.2012.011
PMID:25276679        PMCID:PMC4161071

The Efficacy of Massage Therapy and Breathing Techniques on Pain Intensity and Physiological Responses to Labor Pain

Original Research

Mahin Kamalifard 1 * , Mahnaz Shahnazi 1, Manizheh Sayyah Melli 2, Shirin Allahverdizadeh 3, Shiva Toraby 4, Atefeh Ghahvechi 4


Abstract
Introduction: There are many non-pharmacological methods for relieving labor pain. The preferable method is certainly the one that is effective and harmless. Therefore, we decided to compare the efficacy of massage therapy and breathing techniques on pain intensity, physiological responses to labor pain, labor type and the outcomes. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in Alzahra Hospital in Tabriz. At first, 4o primigravidas, satisfying the inclusion criteria, were selected and randomly divided into two groups of massage 1 (M1) and breathing 1 (B1). Then, another 42 mothers were selected based on the same criteria and randomly divided into two groups of massage 2 (M2) and breathing 2 (B2). An educated researcher assistant (ERA) provided practical training to (B1 and B2 groups) by holding one educational session. As the labor process started, the ERA, who was present at the labor room, repeated the breathing technique for B1 and B2 groups. The breathing groups employed the techniques during the first or second stage of labor at 4, 6, 8 and 10 centimeter of dilatation for 30 minutes. The intensity of pain was measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS) 30 minutes after determining dilatation. The physiological responses were evaluated at the same time intervals. The ERA performed massaging at the same dilatations for M1 and M2 groups. The data was collected similarly. Labor progression was evaluated by the partograph. Results: Massage at 4 and 6 cm dilatations and breathing at most dilatations decreased pain scores significantly. The mean difference of pain intensity and physiological responses to pain was not significant between the massaging and breathing groups at most dilatations. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this research, providing the possibility of choosing one or both methods for labor pain relief and decreasing cesarean section rate is suggested.





Comments
First name  
Last name  
Email address  
Comments  
Security code



This Article
PDF

Google Scholar
Articles by Kamalifard M
Articles by Shahnazi M
Articles by Sayyah Melli M
Articles by Allahverdizadeh S
Articles by Toraby S
Articles by Ghahvechi A

PubMed
Articles by Kamalifard M
Articles by Shahnazi M
Articles by Sayyah Melli M
Articles by Allahverdizadeh S
Articles by Toraby S
Articles by Ghahvechi A

Similar articles in PubMed

Share this article!
© 2016 Tabriz University of Medical Sciences; unless otherwise stated
Press Manuscript Online. Powered by MAADRAYAN